Perencanaan Partisipasi Menuju Keadilan Sosial Studi Kasus Inklusi Sosial Orang Berkebutuhan Khusus Bagaimana Memberdayakan Orang Berkebutuhan Khusus dalam Perencanaan Transportasi

Main Article Content

Junedi Sembiring

Abstract

Participatory planning for disabled people in transportation planning processes has become important. Because, it gives insight in what the disabled-peoples preferences are, improve decision making and advance justice. It is inline with regulation that United Nation made and also Traffic and Road Transportation Act No 9/2009 that  Government of Indonesian was made. But, there are some barriers of participation to include disabled people; it can be time and money consuming. Other problems are related to the accessibility of facilities; physical impairment, unfamiliar procedure and willingness to participate by disabled people.  It is important for the policy makers to know how to empower disabled people and increase their participation in planning processes by considering these barriers. This study investigates how to include disabled people in transportation planning processes.   It provides lessons learned from United Kingdom and Canada as the best practice of inclusion disabled people in transportation planning processes. The inclusion of disabled people is analyzed based on a case study of Bus Rapid Transit-Transjakarta, Indonesia. Data were gathered using interviews, questionnaire, literature and document review. A descriptive qualitative analysis was used to analyze the data. The result show that applied participatory tools to empower disabled people in planning processes was not sufficient enough. A higher level of participation can be strived for by changing the legal framework, investments in accessible facilities, commitment of the government, and the network of organization at international, national, and local level. Last but not least, inclusion disabled people is hard to implement. But, at least we try to make social justice in our services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Adam,S, 2013. ”//jakarta.kompasiana.com/ layanan-publik/2013/11/27/rembukprovinsi-jakarta-terobosan-pemprov-dkiwujudkan-demokrasi-deliberatif614508.html” Ahlhorn, F, 2009.Long Term Perspective in Coastal Zone Development. Berlin: Springer Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E and Gauvin F-P.A Review of Public Participation and Consultation Methods. Health Economics and Policy Analysis Research Working Paper. Arnstein,S.R, 2007. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. Atlas.ti.com, 2014. Why ATLAS.ti? Working in Qualitative Data Analysis?.Available: // www.atlasti.com/index.html. Last accessed 5th June 2014 Black&Gregersen, 1997. Participative DecisionMaking: An Integration of Multiple Dimensions. The Tavistock Institute. Bhalla,A&Lapeyre, F, 1997.Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational Framework. Development and Change. 28, p413-433 Bruns, B, 2003.Water Tenure Reform: Developing an Extended Ladder of Participation. Post Conference Version. Burns, K. K., & Gardon,G.L, 2009. Analyzing the impact of disability legislation in Canada and the United States.Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Participatory Planning Towards Social Justice: Case Study Social Inclusion of Disabled People How to Empower Disabled People in Transportation Planning, Junedi Sembiring

Bryson,J.H, 2004. What to do when stakeholder matter. Public Management Review.6 (1), p21–53. Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA), 2007. Bus Rapid Transit: A Canadian Perspective. 25. Canari, 2004.Guidelines for Participatory Planning: A Manual for Caribbean Natural Resource Managers and Planners. Caribbean Natural Resources Institute. Clifford, N.,Shaun, F and Gill, V, 2010. Key Methods in Geography. London: Sage. Cook, I.R, &Swyngedouw,E, 2012.“Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment: Towards a Future Research Agenda.”Urban Studies. Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), 2006.A Federal Disability Act: Opportunities and Challenges. Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), 2013.Renewed Political Commitment and Leadership: An Imperative for the Realization of the Human Rights of Canadians with Disabilities Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), 2005.1.National Transportation Access for People with Disabilities: Moving Backwards Dagun,S,M, 2006. BUSWAY: Terobosan Penanganan Transportasi Jakarta. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan. P35. Disability Knowledge and Research Programme (DKRP), 2005. Developing participatory rural appraisal approaches with disabled people-A pilot project by Disability Development Services Pursat (DDSP). Pursat province. Cambodia Disability Knowledge and Research Programme (DKRP), 2005.Participation of disabled people in the PRSP/PEAP process in Uganda. Dit.BSTP, 2007. Penyusunan rencanai nduk pengembangan angkutan umum berbahan bakar. Unpublished manuscript, PT. Insan Mandiri Konsultan. Fitzsimons A, Hope M, Cooper C and Russell K, 2011. Empowerment and Participation in Youth work. Learning matters Ltd.

Geurs, K.T &Wee,V.B, 2004.Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Transport Geography. 12, p127-140. Gov.UK, 2013. Disabled Persons :Transport Advisory Committee (DPTAC).Available: (https:/ /www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ department-for-transport. Last accessed 20th June 2014. Harknett, S, et al, 2005.Executive Summary-Developing participatory rural appraisal approaches with disabled people. Combadia:Disability Knowledge and Research. p2. Human Rights Watch, 2013.Barriers EverywhereLack of Accessibility for People with Disabilities in Russia. IAPP (ny). Spectrum of Participation. Available: //c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iap2.org/ resource/resmgr/files/iap-.pdf. Last accessed 29th Jan 2015. Innes, J.E &Booher, D.E, 2004. Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory & Practice.5 (4), p419–436. Irvin,R.A&Stansbury, J, 2004.Citizen Participation in Decision Making: is it Wort the Effort?” Public Administration Review;Pg. 55 Irwantoet. al, 2010. Situation Analysis of Disability in Indonesia: A Desk-Review of Disability Studies Center. Faculty of Social Sciences and Politics. Universitas Indonesia. Lenny, 2011. Transjakarta Berpotensi Jadi BRT Terbaik di Dunia. Available: // www.jakarta.go.id/v2/news/2011/04/ Transjakarta-Berpotensi-Jadi-BRT-Terbaikdi-Dunia#.U5hxEdKQYyE. Last accessed 8 Juni 2011. Litman, T. (ny). The Canadian Perspective on Transport Planning.Transport Planning in Canada. Litman,T, 2003. Social Inclusion As A Transport Planning Issue in Canada. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Litman,T,2013.Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning.Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Rica, 2013. Public transport: A guide for older and disabled people. Roo,G. de, 2003. Environmental Planning in the Netherlands, Too Good to be True. Ashgate. Aldershot (UK) (Chap 4). Selman, P, 2001.Social Capital, Sustainability and Environmental Planning. Planning Theory & Practice,p13- 30. Sathaye, J, et al, 2007.Sustainable Development and Mitigation. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge

Soltani, S.H.K., Sham,M.,Awang,M.,and Yaman,R, 2012.Accessibility for Disabled in Public Transportation Terminal. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.35, p89-96. WHO, 1980. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva Wee, B. Van,2011.Transport and Ethics-Ethics and the Evaluation of Transport Policies and Project,. Transport Economics, Management and Policy. World Bank, 1999.Poverty and Disability: a survey of the literature. World Bank, 2007.Bus Rapid Transit Accessibility Guidelines.