Optimized AIS-Derived Indicators through Application of Port Administrative Boundaries

Main Article Content

Gery Nastiar
Setia Pramana
Dewi Krismawati

Abstract

Defining port boundaries for Automatic Identification System (AIS) data processing is challenging, since docks and berthing facilities are relatively easy to define, while anchorage zones in open waters are often less clearly delineated. This study uses administrative boundaries, known as Daerah Lingkungan Kerja Pelabuhan (Port Working Area, DLKr), to represent port areas as the Area of Interest (AoI) in AIS data processing. With DLKr, port boundaries can be clearly outlined and divided into several zones, enabling more accurate calculation of AIS-derived indicators. The research estimates port calls and port stay durations using the Stationary Marine Broadcast Method (SMBM), focusing on cargo, tanker, and passenger vessels at the Port of Tanjung Priok during 2024. The AIS-derived indicators generated with DLKr as the AoI show good performance, with an RMSE of 55.94 and a MAPE of 5.27%. In addition, the results are supported by the similarity in patterns and distribution of port call values when compared with the official maritime statistics provided by the Ministry of Transportation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

[1] N. Evmides, “An Intelligent Framework for Vessel Traffic Monitoring using AIS Data,” in International Conference on Mobile Data Management, 2022, pp. 413–418. doi: 10.1109/MDM55031.2022.00091.

[2] Asian Development Bank, “Methodological Framework For Unlocking Maritime Insights Using Automatic Identification System Data,” 2023. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/FLS230401-2.

[3] S. Arslanalp, M. Marini, and P. Tumbarello, “Big Data on Vessel Traffic : Nowcasting Trade Flows in Real Time,” 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513521121.001.

[4] E. Djunarsjah and A. P. Putra, “The concept of an archipelagic Province in Indonesia,” in Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, vol. 777, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/777/1/012040.

[5] M. M. Rahmadi et al., “The vulnerability of Small Islands from Coastlines Change in Indonesia The vulnerability of Small Islands from Coastlines Change in Indonesia,” 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1095/1/012026.

[6] C. Amin, H. Mulyati, E. Anggraini, and T. Kusumastanto, “Impact of maritime logistics on archipelagic economic development,” Curr. Opin. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 157–164, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.01.004.

[7] A. Hardianto, L. Adrianto, and I. Fahmi, “The Identification of Typologies and Levels Utilization of Non-Commercial Ports in Indonesia Using the Machine Learning Method,” Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1381–1395, 2024, doi: 10.18280/isi.290413.

[8] S. Wahyuni, A. A. Taufik, and F. K. P. Hui, “Exploring key variables of port competitiveness: evidence from Indonesian ports,” Compet. Rev. An Int. Bus. J., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 529–553, 2020, doi: 10.1108/CR-11-2018-0077.

[9] L. Wu, Y. Xu, and F. Wang, “Identifying port calls of ships by uncertain reasoning with trajectory data,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 9, no. 12, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijgi9120756.

[10] C. Iphar, I. Le, É. Foulquier, and A. Napoli, “Port call extraction from vessel location data for characterising harbour traffic,” Ocean Eng., vol. 293, no. July 2023, p. 116771, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116771.

[11] D. Bahari et al., “Analisis Fungsi Kesatuan Penjagaan Laut dan Pantai ( KPLP )/ Indonesia Sea and Coast Guard Guna Penegakan Hukum Pelayaran Di Daerah Lingkungan Kerja dan Daerah Lingkungan Kepentingan Pelabuhan Tanjung Mas Semarang ( Tinjauan Yuridis Undang – Undang No 17,” Din. Bahari J. Marit. Dyn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.46484/db.v1i1.187.

[12] Kementerian Perhubungan, “Petunjuk Teknis Penyusunan Batas-Batas Daerah Lingkungan Kerja (DLKr) Dan Daerah Lingkungan Kepentingan Pelabuhan (DLKp),” 2017.

[13] Y. Fahmi, H. Agustina, and E. Frimawaty, “A Study on Sustainable Waste Management Facilities (Reception Facilities) at Ports: A Case Study of Tanjung Priok Port,” Asian J. Soc. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1457–1470, 2025, doi: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i8.552.

[14] R. Simanjuntak, D. W. Sihombing, B. Wiwoho, N. Dwiyani, and T. Kismantoro, “Analisis Statistika Ships Turnaround Time di Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok,” J. Penelit. Transp. Laut, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 70–80, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.25104/transla.v25i2.2293.

[15] L. P. Yudanto, “Analisis Penggunaan STID Pada Pelabuhan Auto Gate System,” J. Ilm. Wahana Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 24.2, pp. 744–749, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/9639

[16] N. Van Der Wielen, J. McGurk, and L. Barrett, “Optimising port arrival statistics: Enhancing timeliness through Automatic Identification System (AIS) data,” Stat. J. IAOS, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 421–434, 2024, doi: 10.3233/SJI-230100.

[17] J. Malisan and W. Tresnawati, “Implementasi Inaportnet dalam Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu di Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Surabaya,” War. Penelit. Perhub., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 67–74, 2019, doi: 10.25104/warlit.v31i2.1267.

[18] I. Amsyari et al., “Analysis of Concession , Technology , and Service Implementation on Port Infrastructure Performance : A Case Study in DKI Jakarta and Banten Provinces,” J. Penelit. Transp. Laut, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 32–49, 2024, doi: 10.25104/transla.v26i1.2371.

[19] D. Yang, L. Wu, S. Wang, H. Jia, K. X. Li, and D. Yang, “How big data enriches maritime research – a critical review of Automatic Identification System ( AIS ) data applications How big data enriches maritime research – a critical review of,” Transp. Rev., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–19, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01441647.2019.1649315.

[20] Badan Pusat Statistik, “Navigasi Cerdas : Pemanfaatan AIS Untuk Statistik Transportasi Laut di Indonesia,” 2024.

[21] S. Zhang, H. A. Barrett, S. V. Baros, P. R. H. Neville, S. Talasila, and L. L. Sinclair, “Georeferencing Accuracy Assessment of Historical Aerial Photos Using a Custom-Built Online Georeferencing Tool,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 11, no. 12, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijgi11120582.

[22] A. B. Abdulghafour and H. Salman, “The Benefits of Using Bar Charts in Company Websites The Benefits of Using Bar Charts in Company Websites,” 2019. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/662/3/032003.

[23] R. L. Nuzzo, “The Box Plots Alternative for Visualizing Quantitative Data,” Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 8, pp. 268–272, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.02.001.

[24] K. E. Chin, F. F. Jiew, and J. E. Luaran, “Making Sense of Line Graphs,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 286–300, 2025, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v21i1.5474.

[25] L. Zhang et al., “Analysis of energy consumption prediction for office buildings based on GA-BP and BP algorithm,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 50, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103445.

[26] Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, “Batas-batas Daerah Lingkungan Kerja Perairan dan Daerah Lingkungan Kepentingan Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok dan Marunda,” 2025.

[27] K. E. Marysan and K. O. Sembiring, “Kinerja return sektor transportasi dan logistik papan utama menjelang Idul Fitri Katarina Ersyn Marysan,” Manaj. Bisnis dan Keuang. Korporat, vol. 1, no. 2022, pp. 63–69, 2023, doi: 10.58784/mbkk.51.

[28] J. Franzkeit, H. Pache, and C. Jahn, “Investigation of Vessel Waiting Times Using AIS Data,” in Dynamics in Logistics: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (LDIC 2020), 2020, pp. 70–78. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_7.